All questions

Can teachers use ChatGPT to grade student work?

Short answer

Only with care. AI can help draft feedback on low-stakes work, but it should never be the sole marker, and identifiable student work should not go into a consumer chatbot. Remove names and personal details, use a school-approved tool, check every mark yourself, and keep AI out of high-stakes grading.

Teachers can use AI to help with feedback on low-stakes work, but not as the final judge of a grade, and not by pasting identifiable student work into a consumer chatbot. The teacher must check and own every mark. For anything high-stakes, keep AI out of the marking.

What official guidance says

Where AI feedback can help

In the 2025 Gallup teacher survey, 57% of teachers who used AI for grading and feedback said it improved the quality of that work at least somewhat. It is most useful for:

A safe workflow

  1. Use a school-approved tool with a data agreement, not a personal account.
  2. Anonymize first. Remove names, student IDs and personal details from the text.
  3. Give the AI your rubric. Paste the success criteria and ask for feedback against each one.
  4. Ask for feedback, not a grade. "List two strengths and one next step against these criteria" is safer than "Give this a score out of 20".
  5. Check everything. AI can miss what a student was trying to do, praise errors or be harsher on unusual writing styles.
  6. Make the final judgement yourself and record it in your normal way.

Where to keep AI out

Tell students and parents

If AI helps draft feedback, say so. Students should know the comments were reviewed by their teacher, and parents should know which tool was used and how data was protected. For other low-risk ways to reclaim time, see How can teachers use AI to save time? and AI tools for teachers in 2026.

Bring safe AI into your classroom

Askie for Schools brings a safe, age-appropriate AI learning companion to your students, managed from your teacher account.

Explore Askie for Schools